Back

Saturnino Pineda, Et Al. Vs. Vidal Pingul, Et Al. 092 Phil 89

SATURNINO PINEDA, ET AL., petitioners, vs. VIDAL PINGUL and COURT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, respondents.

G.R. No. L-5565 | 1952-09-30

D E C I S I O N


PARAS, C.J.:

On June 18, 1951, respondent Vidal Pingul filed in the Court of Industrial Relations a complaint against Saturnino Pineda and some 68 others (petitioners herein), alleging that the latter are his tenants who had refused to agree to and sign the contract of rice tenancy proposed by Pingul providing for a 45-55 sharing ratio, and praying that said tenants be ordered ejected if they insist in their refusal. The petitioners filed an answer alleging that the proposed contract is not in accordance with law and public policy, and praying that judgment be rendered giving effect to Republic Act No. 34 which provides...