Back

Martin Casalla Vs. Emeterio Enage

MARTIN CASALLA, plaintiff-appellee, vs. EMETERIO ENAGE, ET AL., defendants-appellants.

G.R. No. 2420 | 1906-09-24

D E C I S I O N


WILLARD, J.:

We can not say that the findings of fact contained in the judgment of the court below are plainly and manifestly against the weight of the evidence, and the judgment based upon such findings can not, therefore, be reversed by us. (Benedicto vs. De la Rama, 201 U. S., 303.)

The court erred in admitting as evidence the books of account presented by the plaintiff. There was nothing in them which tended to support the claim of the plaintiff, but that error could not have in any way prejudiced the defendants (sec. 503, Code of Civil Procedure), for there was evidence in addition to that claimed to have been...