Back

Pineda & Ampil Manufacturing Co., Et Al. Vs. Arsenio Bartolome, Et Al. 095 Phil 930

PINEDA & AMPIL MANUFACTURING CO. and ISAAC AMPIL, petitioners, vs. ARSENIO BARTOLOME, MANUEL BARTOLOME and COURT OF APPEALS, respondents.

G.R. No. L-6904 | 1954-09-30

D E C I S I O N


BAUTISTA ANGELO, J.:

This is a petition for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals granting the writ of certiorari applied for and ordering the court of origin to quash the amended information filed against the accused on the ground that while said amended information does not charge two separate offenses of estafa, nor the crime of malicious mischief, as contended by the latter, nevertheless, it charges the crime of falsification of private document as an offense separate and distinct from that of estafa and, therefore, it should be quashed on that ground.

On September 4, 1951, an information for estafa was filed...