Back

Rubert & Guamis Vs. Luengo & Martinez, Et Al.

RUBERT & GUAMIS, plaintiffs-appellees, vs. LUENGO & MARTINEZ, ET AL., defendants-appellants.

G.R. No. L-3067 | 1907-09-10

D E C I S I O N


WILLARD, J.:

The appellees make the point in their brief in this court that although the appellants made a motion for a new trial in the court below on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence, yet no order was made by the court upon that motion and of course no exception was taken to any order denying such motion, and that, therefore, this court can not review the evidence. An examination of the record shows that this point is well taken.

The defendants having denied all of the allegations of the complaint, our examination must be confined to the facts stated in the decision. Among other facts therein stated are...