Back

Potenciano Ilusorio vs. Court of Agrarian Relations (CAR) 17 SCRA 25

POTENCIANO ILUSORIO and TERESA ILUSORIO, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF AGRARIAN RELATIONS, PASCUAL MANALILI, SANTIAGO PANGILINAN, IRENEO DE LA CRUZ, GONZALO SANTIAGO, GRACIANO MANGALINDAN, JOSE MALLARE, RICARDO BALMEO, SALVADOR SANTIAGO, VALENTIN PACHECO, LEANDRO MANINGAS, EMILIANO PACHECO, TIMOTEO MAGCALAS, ARTEMIO GABRIEL and MIGUEL STA. ANA, respondents.

G.R. No. L-20344 | 1966-05-16

D E C I S I O N 
 
 
CONCEPCION, J.: 
 
Appeal from a decision of the Court of Agrarian Relations, the dispositive part of which reads: 
 
"IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING, the Court hereby holds that Sec. 14 of Rep. Act No. 1199, as amended, is constitutional and the leasehold system of tenancy shall govern the relationship of the parties, except Nicodemus Magcalas and Miguel Santiago, starting with the 1961-1962 agri-year. 
 
"Petitioners are hereby ordered to pay per agri-year to respondent-landholders rentals in the amount appearing opposite their names: 
 
NAMES RENT IN CAVANS OF...