Back

Augusto Cosio, Et Al. vs. Cherie Palileo

AUGUSTO COSIO and BEATRIZ DE RAMA, petitioners, vs. CHERIE PALILEO, respondent.

G.R. No. L-18452 | 1966-05-20

D E C I S I O N 


REGALA, J.: 

Petitioners have filed a motion for reconsideration of the decision in this case in so far as it declares petitioner Cosio de Rama to be possessor in bad faith of a house, with obligation to pay rental for its use. 

Petitioners contend, first of all, that Cosio de Rama could have known that she was not entitled to the possession of the house before the decision in Palileo v. Cosio, 97 Phil. 919 (1955), because even Palileo herself referred to Cosio de Rama as the owner of the house. For instance, the following portion of a letter, written by Palileo to Sor Consuelo of the Hospicio de San Jose,...