Back

Felipe De Leon, Et Al. vs. Pampanga Sugar Dev. Co., Inc.

FELIPE DE LEON, BALDOMERO SALVADOR, MARTINIANO EVANGELISTA, VICENTE PANLAQUI, CASTOR TUASON, FRANCISCO GONZALO, ENRIQUE PAGCU, CLAUDIO SICHION, ESTANISLAO SICHON, RUBEN ICBAN, ABONDINO ISIP, LUIS P. ISIP, DIOSDADO P. GONZALES, MAXIMO PAULE, FAUSTINO DIMATULAC, MATEO BAUTISTA, WILFREDO AYCARDO, HORACIO OCAMPO, FABIAN MENESES, FLORENTINO GARCIA and JOSE D. GALANG, petitioners, vs. PAMPANGA SUGAR, DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., respondent.

G.R. No. L-26844 | 1969-09-30

D E C I S I O N 


CASTRO, J.: 

Review on certiorari of the resolution dated October 14, 1966 of the Court of Industrial Relations (CIR) dismissing the petitioners' complaint in case 38-V. 

The respondent Pampanga Sugar Development Company (PASUDECO) operates a sugar central at San Fernando, Pampanga. The petitioners, 21 all told, were its security guards required to work eight hours a day, seven days a week. On November 28, 1961 the petitioners filed with the CIR a complaint seeking payment to them of premium or differential pay in the total amount P49,581.79, plus attorney's fees of P3,000 and costs of suit. Upon the finding...