Back

Santos VDA. De Bonifacio, et al vs. B.L.T. Bus Co., Inc., et al

ROSARIO SANTOS VDA. DE BONIFACIO, VIRGINIA BONIFACIO, ROSALINDA BONIFACIO, ROMEO BONIFACIO, ZENAIDA BONIFACIO, GENEROSO BONIFACIO, ANDRES BONIFACIO, JOSE BONIFACIO, JOVITO BONIFACIO, JR., CORAZON BONIFACIO, ALBERTO CONCEPCION, AGUSTIN ANGELES and ELISA AN

G.R. No. L-26810 | 1970-08-31

PART 1/3 


Along the same line of reasoning, respondent court as well as respondent company are raising, in their respective answers, the issue that the resolution of respondent court of July 22, 1964 is already final, inasmuch as petitioners' motion for new trial of August 6, 1964 did not suspend the period for filing a certiorari by way of appeal to this Court within the period provided for in Rule 43. On this point, We adhere to the liberality of the law with respect to procedural matters enunciated, as already stated above, in Section 20 of Com. Act 103. It appearing that the respondent court did actually act, for the reasons stated...