Back

[5/5] Rp., et al vs. De Los Angeles

[5/5] REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, MIGUEL TOLENTINO, SR., ZOILA DE CHAVEZ, DEOGRACIAS MERCADO, MARIANO PANTOJA, GUILLERMO MERCADO, AGAPITO REYES, ISIDRO BESAS, LEONA LACHICA, ELENO MACALINDONG, DIONISIO MACALINDONG, DOROTEO SARA, JOAQUIN CAUNCERAN, VIRGILIO AGU

G.R. No. L-26112 | 1971-10-04

said case, that this Court felt constrained therein to reverse the decision appealed from.
Respondents herein have in their favor no judicial declaration, contained in a final judgment, similar or even comparable to that made in favor of the Arces. In fact, the former do not have the equities that the latter had.

3. The Siari Valley case

This case involved a decision of the Supreme Court affirming that of the Court of First Instance, the dispositive part of which was quoted only partially in our decision. The question was raised as to whether or not the portion not so quoted in our confirmatory decision had, also, been affirmed. Holding...