Back

[4/4] Banzon, et al vs. Cruz, et al

[4/4] ANTONIO R. BANZON and ROSA BALMACEDA, petitioners, vs. HON. FERNANDO CRUZ, Spouses PEDRO CARDENAS and LEONILA BALUYOT and ASSOCIATED INSURANCE & SURETY COMPANY, INC. represented by INSURANCE COMMISSIONER in her capacity as LIQUIDATOR OF ASSOCIATED INSURAN

G.R. No. L-31789 | 1972-06-29

asking for, which is no more than what the majority call "the immediate objectives".

There are other loose statements of legal principles in the majority opinion, but they are minor ones and any further discussion if all of them will unduly extend this opinion.

Incidentally, as I close, I am tempted to ask this question: With the way the majority has disposed, of this case in their opinion, is it not rather ambiguous now what has become of Civil Case No. 79244 in the Manila court and how specifically We expect the said court to dispose of the same?

IV

MY VOTE

IN VIEW OF ALL THE FOREGOING, and differently from the majority, I vote to...