Back

De la Rama vs. Dizon

JOSE V. DE LA RAMA, complainant, vs. ATTY. WILFRIDO E. DIZON, respondent.

A.C. No. 1213 | 1976-07-29

R E S O L U T I O N

AQUINO, J:

Jose V. de la Rama, in his verified complaint dated June 21, 1973, charged Atty. Wilfrido E. Dizon with malpractice and unethical conduct for having supplanted him (De la Rama) as the lawyer of Lourdes G. Fernandez and DI'Mark's Inc., an entity headed by Arthur Fernandez, the husband of Lourdes.

Respondent Dizon denied the charge. He branded it as an act of harassment. In his comment he reproduced the letters of De la Rama to the Fernandez spouses and to Father Robert Bomeisil, S.J. of Ateneo de Manila, chairman of the board of directors of DI'Mark's Inc. In those three letters Atty. De la Rama admitted...