Back

[2/3] RP, et al. Vs. CA, et al.

[2/3] REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES and CITY OF CAGAYAN DE ORO, petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, BENEDICTA MACABALE SALCEDO, ISIDRO S. BACULIO, EMMANUEL AKUT, IRENEO ORLINO, LUCY P. GASTON, ROSARIO JAVIER, HONESTO N. SALCEDO, RUPERTA AGUILOR, GORGONIA BRIONES, FRANCISCO Q. BELTRAN, ERIBERTO CAMBA, GENOVEVA C. SAN JUAN, FEDERICO P. PICAR, EUGENIA GARCIA, THE LAND REGISTRATION COMMISSION, and THE REGISTER OF DEEDS OF MISAMIS ORIENTAL, respondents. / PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, ISIDRO S. BACULIO and JOSEFINA W. BACARRISAS, respondents.

G.R. No. L-41115 | 1982-09-11

SECOND ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR

IN L-41115

"The respondent Court of Appeals erred in relying heavily on extraneous matters which were not even brought up, adduced, offered much less admitted in evidence both in the criminal (CA-G.R. No. 15289-CR) and civil (CA-G.R. No. 46566-R) aspects of the case at bar. This is contrary to basic and fundamental rules of procedure and violative of the due process clause of the Constitution.

IN L-41116

"The respondent Court gravely erred in rendering the decision by relying on matters not presented, nor offered, much less admitted in evidence. Such a decision is in violation of the due process clause of the...