Back

Rosario Lacsamana, etal, vs. I. A. Court, etal.

ROSARIO LACSAMANA, FLORENCIO BAUTISTA, QUIRICO PACLIBAR, EDUARDO OCAMPO, JULIO BARIZO, PEDRO PANGILINAN, ET AL., petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE SECOND SPECIAL CASES DIVISION OF THE INTERMEDIATE APPELLATE COURT, ANICIA I. CRUZ, ET AL., respondents.

G.R. No. 73146-53 | 1986-08-26

D E C I S I O N


FERIA, J:

The Court rules for the guidance of Bench and Bar, that a motion for extension of time to file a petition for review under Section 22 of The Judiciary Reorganization Act (Batas Pambansa Blg. 129) and Section 22(b) of the Interim Rules, may properly be filed with and granted by the Intermediate Appellate Court (now renamed Court of Appeals).

In the case at bar, a decision was rendered against petitioners by the Regional Trial Court of Makati, Metro Manila, in an appeal from the decision of the Metropolitan Trial Court of Makati, Metro Manila. Copy of said decision was received by counsel for petitioners on...