Back

Sixto Pantoja Vs. Claro Palencia 025 Phil 644

SIxTO PANTOJA, plaintiff-appellant, vs. CLARO PALENCIA, defendant-appellee.

G.R. No. 7206 | 1913-01-27

D E C I S I O N


ARELLANO, C.J.:

Catalino Pantoja owed Claro Palencia P215 Philippine currency as rent for a piece of arable land which belonged to the latter and was leased to the former on shares. An action was instituted for the collection of the debt and Catalino Pantoja was sentenced to pay the same. In execution of the judgment, four parcels of land, thought to be Catalino Pantojas, were sold at public auction, and thereby transferred to Claro Palencia.

But Sixto Pantoja intervened in the suit, both before and after the auction, as the owner of said four parcels, and exhibited a notarial instrument of sale, executed in his favor...