Back

Benjamin Dihiansan, et al. vs. CA, et al.

BENJAMIN DIHIANSAN, LOURDES LARGOZA and RAMON KING, petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS * and JOSE SERRANO, respondents.

G.R. No. L-49539 | 1987-09-14

D E C I S I O N

TEEHANKEE, J p:

The Court dismisses the petition and affirms the questioned decision of respondent Court of Appeals which found no reversible error in the judgment of the trial court. 1 Well-settled is the rule that findings of facts of the Court of Appeals are conclusive on the parties and the Supreme Court, subject to certain recognized exceptions which have no application here. 2 In reviews on certiorari the Court addresses only the questions of law, since it is not its function to analyze or weigh the evidence all over again (which has already been done by the trial court as the trier of facts and the appellate court...