Back

P.E.Domingo &Co., Inc. vs. Remigio E. Zari

P.E. DOMINGO & CO., INC., PRIMITIVO E. DOMINGO, ROSARIO R. DOMINGO, LORETTA D. PANIS, AMADOR R. DOMINGO, ISIDORO M. DOMINGO, DANILO R. DOMINGO and IRENEO R. DOMINGO, petitioners, vs. HON. REMIGIO E. ZARI and THE GOVERNMENT SERVICE INSURANCE SYSTEM (GSIS), respondents.

G.R. No. L-74211 | 1988-03-25

D E C I S I O N


CRUZ, J.:

These two cases have been consolidated because they involve the same question, to wit, the correct interpretation of Rule 32, Section 2, of the Rules of Court, on trial with assessors.

G.R. No. 76299 is an appeal by certiorari under Rule 45 from a decision of the Court of Appeals sustaining that right while G.R. No. 74211 is a petition for certiorari under Rule 65 questioning a decision of the trial court denying such right. Both cases raise the corollary question of whether or not the right had been seasonably invoked.

These cases arose from certain loans obtained by P.E. Domingo and Co. and several other...