Back

Diosdado V. Ruffy vs. National Labor Relations Commission, et al.

DIOSDADO V. RUFFY, petitioner, vs. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, and CENTRAL AZUCARERA DON PEDRO, respondents.

G.R. No. 84193 | 1990-02-15

D E C I S I O N


SARMIENTO, J.:

This refers to the application of the provisions of Section 13 of Batas Blg. 130 prescribing the procedure for the dismissal of workers. The facts are undisputed.

xxx xxx xxx

The complainant was employed in December 1977 by the respondent with the salary of P37.31 a day. He was assigned in the Materials and Supply Section, Supply and Warehousing Department of the respondent. His duties, among others, were to verify and check incoming materials and supplies and issuing requisitioned materials and supplies to authorized personnel of the various departments.

On November 3, 1984, complainant issued...