Back

Valentina De Torres Vs. Narciso De Torres, Et Al. 028 Phil 49

VALENTINA DE TORRES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. NARCISO DE TORRES ET AL., defendants-appellants.

G.R. No. 9234 | 1914-09-19

D E C I S I O N


TORRES, J.:

This appeal, through a bill of exceptions, has been raised by counsel for the defendants from the judgment of January 8, 1913, whereby the Honorable Herbert D. Gale, judge, held, among other findings, that the agreement of partition executed between the plaintiff and the defendants on January 10, 1912, was null and void, and sentenced the defendants to deliver and return to the plaintiff the four parcels of land concerned in the agreement, and, besides, to pay her the costs of the suit, including the fees of the receiver for the deposit.

By a written complaint of April 11, 1912, counsel for Valentina de...