Back

Amelia C. Elayda Vs. Court Of Appeals

AMELIA C. ELAYDA, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS, and SPOUSES PEDRO ROXAS and LEONORA T. ROXAS, respondents. Ambrosio Padilla, Mempin, Reyes, Fernando & Iguidez Law Offices for petitioner. Amelia G. De Castro and Ida R. Makalinao-Javier for private respondents.

G.R. No. 49327 | 1991-07-18

D E C I S I O N


NARVASA, J.:

Once again, in the resolution of an appeal, the Court is called upon to apply a familiar rule of unvarying observance which is, that only questions of law may be raised in a petition for review on certiorari of a judgment of the Court of Appeals, this Court being bound by the latter's findings of fact, 1 subject to certain well defined exceptions. 2 In accordance therewith, the Court now resolves the proceedings at bar.

The proceedings originated from a complaint of Amelia C. Elayda filed in the Court of First Instance (now Regional Trial Court) at Quezon City against the Spouses Pedro Roxas and Leonora T....