Back

Mateo Vs. Court Of Appeals, Et Al. [ DISSENTING OPINION, PADILLA, J.]

LAURA MATEO, petitioner, vs. THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. EUTROPIO MIGRINO, Presiding Judge of the RTC of Pasig, Branch 151, ADELA MENDOZA and the BRANCH SHERIFF OF THE RTC of Pasig, Branch 151, respondents.

G.R. No. 97839 | 1993-04-22

DISSENTING OPINION
 
PADILLA, J.:
 
The majority opinion has denied the petition for review in this case, which seeks to annul the decision of the Court of Appeals, thus, upholding the dismissal by the Regional Trial Court Branch 151 Pasig of herein petitioner's appeal from the decision in Civil Case No. 21071.
 
The denial is based on a finding that there was no reversible error committed by the Court of Appeals in applying the cases of Arcega v. The Honorable Court of Appeals[1] and Fagnatac, et. al. v. Court Of Appeals[2] and holding that there was failure to prosecute the appeal and that the appeal "aims to accomplish...