Back

Eloisa, Carlos, Jr., Et Al. Vs. Court Of Appeals, Et Al.

ELOISA, CARLOS, JR., ARCHIMEDES, CAROLINE, and MA. CARLOTA, all surnamed ARAMBULO, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and ENGR. DANILO G. FERRERAS, respondents.

G.R. No. 105818 | 1993-09-17

D E C I S I O N


DAVIDE, JR., J.:

Petitioners urge us to review and set aside the Resolution of the respondent Court of Appeals of 11 November 1991 1 in CA-G.R. CV No. 32348 2 which, for failure to pay the docket fee, considered their appeal "ABANDONED and DISMISSED, pursuant to Section 1(d), Rule 50, Rules of Court," and its Resolution of 8 June 1992 3 which denied their motion to reconsider the former. They claim that the notice to pay the docket fee was addressed to an attorney who had already withdrawn his appearance with their consent.

The pleadings of the parties and the original record of CA-G.R. CV No. 32348 disclose the...