Back

Geruncio H. Ilagan, Et Al. Vs. Court Of Appeals, Et Al. [DECISION]

GERUNCIO H. ILAGAN, CLARO PI?ON and ROSENDO PI?ON, petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, HON. ARTURO A. ROMERO, SALVADOR Q. QUIMPO and HOMETRUST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, respondents.

G.R. No. 110617 | 1994-12-29

D E C I S I O N
 
REGALADO, J.:
 
This case presents another instance of the mode of advocacy that bedevils our criminal justice system, evoking thereby the jeremiad of herein respondent corporation against the abuse of certiorari for unnecessary delay in the resolution of a mere interlocutory order. Indeed, considering its revelations and the supporting annexes to its comment,[1] this appeal as initially resolved by the First Division was advisedly accepted by the Court En Banc so that we may write finis to such a simple incident as a motion to quash which for years has regrettably...