Back

[8/8] Kilosbayan, Et Al. Vs. Manuel L. Morato, Et Al.

[8/8]KILOSBAYAN, INCORPORATED, JOVITO R. SALONGA, CIRILO A. RIGOS, ERME CAMBA, EMILIO C. CAPULONG, JR., JOSE T. APOLO, EPHRAIM TENDERO, FERNANDO SANTIAGO, JOSE ABCEDE, CHRISTINE TAN, RAFAEL G. FERNANDO, RAOUL V. VICTORINO, JOSE CUNANAN, QUINTIN S. DOROMAL, SEN. FREDDIE WEBB, SEN. WIGBERTO TA?ADA, REP. JOKER P. ARROYO, petitioners, vs. MANUEL L. MORATO, in his capacity as Chairman of the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office, and the PHILIPPINE GAMING MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, respondents.

G.R. No. 118910 | 1995-07-17

Footnotes

1 The doctrine of "conclusiveness of judgment" is also called "collateral estoppel" or "preclusion of issues," as distinguished from "preclusion of claims" or res judicata. In the Rules of Court, the first (conclusiveness of judgment, collateral estoppel or preclusion of issues) is governed by Rule 39, § 49(c), while the second (res judicata or preclusion of claims) is found in Rule 39, §49(b).

2 2 RECORD OF THE BATASAN, Sept. 6, 1979. 1006-07. (Emphasis added)

FELICIANO, J., dissenting:

1 Kilosbayan, Inc., et al. v. Teofisto Guingona, etc., et al., 232 SCRA 110, at 153 (1994).

2 Opening paragraph, Section 1,...