Back

Thunga Chui vs Que Bentec

THUNGA CHUI, plaintiff-appellee, vs. QUE BENTEC, defendant-appellant.

G.R. No. 929 | 1903-10-08

D E C I S I O N

WILLARD, J.:

This case was before this court in November, 1902. It was then decided that the only question open to the appellant was whether the findings of fact made by the trial judge in his decision supported the judgment. (Thunga Chui vs. Que Bentec, 1 Off. Gaz., p. 4.) 1

The appellant claims that the partnership contract was required to be in writing by article 119 of the Code of Commerce and, the amount of the capital being more than 1,500 pesetas, by article 1280 of the Civil Code and article 51 of the Code of Commerce.

We think it fairly appears from the decision that the contract of partnership was not in writing....