Back

[2/2] Damaso Flores vs CA and Rolando Ligon

[2/2] DAMASO S. FLORES, petitioner, vs. COURT OF APPEALS (Thirteenth Division) and ROLANDO R. LIGON, respondents.

G.R. No. 97556 | 1996-07-29

G.R. NO. 101152

In the course of the unfolding of the aforegoing events, petitioner filed various administrative complaints[27] against Judge Bernardo Abesamis and Judge Teodoro Regino on such grounds as: serious misconduct, inefficiency and gross ignorance of the law.

The fact that Judge Abesamis upheld the consolidation of absolute ownership over the Parañaque Cockpit Stadium in favor of private respondent, justified the retention by private respondent of possession over the said stadium and its non-reversion to petitioner who, after all, had been found by the respondent appellate court to be private respondent's judgment debtor...