Back

Pacita David-Chan vs. Court of Appeals, et al.

PACITA DAVID-CHAN, petitioner vs. COURT OF APPEALS and PHIL. RABBIT BUS LINES, INC., respondents.

G.R. No. 105294 | 1997-02-26

D E C I S I O N


PANGANIBAN, J.:

In pleading for an easement of right of way, petitioner correctly cites the requirements of law but fails to provide factual support to show her entitlement thereto. Since findings of facts by the Court of Appeals affirming those of the trial court are binding on the Supreme Court, the petition must thus fail. Even petitioner's plea for equity becomes unavailing because resort to equity is possible only in the absence, and never in contravention, of statutory law.

The petition assails the Decision 1 of respondent Court 2 promulgated on April 30, 1992. The Decision of respondent Court affirmed the...