Back

Rodolfo Morales vs. Court of Appeals

RODOLFO MORALES, represented by his heirs, and PRISCILA MORALES, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS (Former Seventeenth Division), RANULFO ORTIZ, JR., and ERLINDA ORTIZ, respondents.

G.R. No. 117228 | 1997-06-19

D E C I S I O N

DAVIDE, JR., J:

In this petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, petitioners urge this Court to reverse the 20 April 1994 decision of the Court of Appeals (Seventeenth Division) in CA-G.R. CV No. 34936,1 which affirmed in toto the 26 August 1991 decision of the Regional Trial Court of Calbayog City in Civil Case No. 265.

Civil Case No. 265 was an action for recovery of possession of land and damages with a prayer for a writ of preliminary mandatory injunction filed by private respondents herein, spouses Ranulfo Ortiz, Jr. and Erlinda Ortiz, against Rodolfo Morales. The complaint prayed that...