Back

State Investment House, Inc. vs. Court of Appeals, et al.

STATE INVESTMENT HOUSE, INC., petitioner vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS, the SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION and PHILIPPINE BLOOMING MILLS, CO., INC., respondents.

G.R. No. 123240 | 1997-08-11

D E C I S I O N


MELO, J.:

In a minute resolution we issued on February 5, 1996, the petition at bench was denied due course for its failure to show that respondent court committed any reversible error (p. 114, Rollo).

On March 1, 1996, petitioner filed a motion for reconsideration imputing upon this Court the principal error of having stated that the doctrine in PCIB vs. Court of Appeals (172 SCRA 436 [1989]), had already been abrogated by the rulings of this Court in the cases of Alemar's Sibal & Sons vs. Elbinias (186 SCRA 94 [1990]; BF Homes Ins. vs. Court of Appeals, 190 SCRA 262 [1990]; Araneta vs. Court of Appeals, 211 SCRA 390...