Back

Domingo Abad, et al. vs. NLRC, et al.

DOMINGO ABAD, TEODORICO ABUAN, RODOLFO ADRIATICO, DAVID ALAMBRA, ARTURO AMBROCIO, ALFREDO APILADO, LAURIANO APILADO, RODOLFO ARIZ, JOSE BALAGOT, MARIANO BALAGOT, JOSE BARNACHEA, PABLO CHAN, ARNULFO CASTRO, JOSE CASUGA, SR., FERDINAND CASUGA, PAULINO CARGO, CARLOS CARGO, VICTORIO CARANTA, AQUILINO CORPUZ, ALEJANDRO CAMPOS, FRANCISCO CABILADOS, RODOLFO CALICO, SIXTO DATO M. SR., ROGELIO DUMAYAS, CONRADO ESTIGAY, LAURO ESPINUESA, ARSENIO FUSELERO, BENJAMIN ESTELLORE, SESINANDO GALVEZ, LIBERATO GABIN, RUFINO HIDALGO, SR., MAMERTO LOPEZ, ERNESTO KANDINGIN, ERNESTO LACONASAY, TORIBIO MASQUITE, OSCAR MUYNA, PABLO NARES, ANTONIO NESPEROS, ALEJANDRO OCHOCO, BENJAMIN OCHOCO, JOSE SOTTO, PROSPERO SATURNINO, ABRAHAM PIMENTEL, ABELARDO PACIO, MAURO QUILANTES, ANTONIO RAMOLETE, FELIPE SUBALA, MELCHOR SALAYON, SUBALA SALAYON A, BENJAMIN SUBALA, SUYAT JOSE, AMADO VALDEZ, ROGELIO VALDEZ, ROGELIO LARENAS, SANTIAGO PURRUGGANAN, ADRIANO GONZALES, TRANQUILINO ABANDO, EUFROCINO AGUIRRE, ROBERTO APILADO, BENITO ARMIENDO, SANTIAGO BALATBAT, RODRIGO BALMEO, LUZVINDO BAMBAO, CRESTITUTO BAMBICO, TEODORO CABALLES, REYNALDO CASTILLO, SR., DIONISIO DE CASTRO, BONIFACIO CUANAN, LEON ERESE, ROBERTO ESPERANZA, JR., MARCELO ESPINUEVA, DANILO ESTOPIN, JOSE FERNANDEZ, TEODORICO FLORA, CRISPIN GAPUZ, ROLANDO JIMENEZ, VICENTE LICTADA, LORENZO LAMAGUE, RODOLDO LAMANGA, ERNESTO MUNAR, FAUSTO OCHOCO, ROMEO ORIS, LEONARDO PIMENTEL, LUDIVICO RAMOS, ALFREDO RIMORIN, PAULINO SANGLAY, LAMBERTO SANTOS, REGINO SUBIDO, SALVADOR TENGCO, VIRGILIO TIONGSON, CARLITO TORIO, and ERNESTO LAIGO, petitioners, vs. HON. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION, THIRD DIVISION and ATLANTIC GULF AND PACIFIC CO., respondents.

G.R. No. 108996 | 1998-02-20

D E C I S I O N

MENDOZA, J:

This is a petition for certiorari seeking to set aside the decision 1 of the National Labor Relations Commission, Third Division, dated November 17, 1992. Said decision reversed the decision of the Labor Arbiter 2 which found for herein petitioners.

The facts of the case are as follows:

Private respondent Atlantic Gulf and Pacific Co. is a construction company engaged, among other things, in building offshore marine structures for third parties. 3

Petitioners were hired by private respondent by its Offshore and Marine Services Division (OMSD). They were employed as mechanic, electrician, welder, painter,...