Back

Serapion, et al. Vs. CA, et al.

BARTOLO SERAPION, AGUSTINA ESPIRITU, ROSA HERMOGENES, BASILISA TRAZONA, DANIEL SANGALANG, GERARDO PRINCIPE, PRIMITIVA MONTARAY, and FELICIDAD TRAZONA, petitioners, vs. COURT OF APPEALS and MAGDALENA BATIMANA ALBERTO assisted by her husband BUENAVENTURA ALBERTO, respondents.

G.R. No. 115039 | 1998-09-22

D E C I S I O N
 
BELLOSILLO, J.:
 
Petitioners assail the decision of the Court of Appeals dated 12 January 1994 as well as its resolution of 12 April 1994 in CA-G.R. No. SP-31997 contending that the appellate court erred in ruling that RA No. 7279[1] otherwise known as the Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992 is not applicable in the instant case for unlawful detainer.

On 10 December 1981, private respondent Magdalena Batimana Alberto, assisted by her husband, filed a complaint for unlawful detainer against petitioners Bartolo Serapion, Agustina Espiritu, Rosa Hermogenes, Basilisa Trazona, Daniel Sangalang, Gerardo Principe,...