Back

Henry Munar Chan, et al. Vs. CA, et al.

HENRY MUNAR CHAN, ANTHONY D. SY, SR., LORY T. NGAN, and ANTHONY D. SY, JR., petitioners, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS (Special Seventh Division) and TEOVILLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, respondents. PHILIPPINE MACHINERY PARTS MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., petitioner, vs. THE COURT OF APPEALS (Special Seventh Division) and TEOVILLE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, respondents.

G.R. No. 118516 | 1998-11-18

D E C I S I O N


PURISIMA, J.:

At bar is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court seeking a review of the Decision1 [Dated November 29, 1994; penned by Associate Justice Fermin A. Martin, Jr. and concurred by Associate Justices Antonio M. Martinez and Conrado M. Vasquez, Jr.] of the Court of Appeals affirming with modification the Decisions2 [Dated November 25, 1982 and November 29, 1982, respectively.] of the former Court of First Instance of Rizal, Branch 29, stationed in Pasay City.

The Court of Appeals culled the facts that matter, thus:

"Teoville Development Corporation is the owner of...