Back

Heirs of Pedro Cabais vs CA, Paglinawan, Loria etal

HEIRS OF PEDRO CABAIS, NAMELY: MAGDALENA BONTO CABAIS, ANTONIO CABAIS, PABLO CABAIS, ANDREA CABAIS, EFREN CABAIS, AGAPITA CABAIS, and ANDRES CABAIS, represented by AVELINA CABAIS, petitioners, vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, CONSTANCIA PAGLINAWAN, PAULINO LORIA, AUREA NICOLAS, ANTONIO LO, SANTOS WANTON, ZENAIDA BATALLER, ISABEL LORIA, ADELAIDA DAUS AND EMMA CARALI, respondents. *** HEIRS OF PEDRO CABAIS, NAMELY: MAGDALENA BONTO CABAIS, CHILDREN: ANTONIO, ANDREA, PABLO, AVELINA, EFREN, AGAPITA and ANDRES all surnamed CABAIS, petitioners vs. THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, HEIRS OF VICTORIA CA?ETA, NAMELY: CELSO represented by his HEIRS, ISABEL, ARMANDO, ROGER, SURNAMED LORIA, HEIRS OF MELECIO LORIA, NAMELY: NIMFA and JOEL, PAULINA LORIA VDA. DE PAGLINAWAN, EMERITA LORIA and SPS. RUFINO NICOLAS and AUREA GOYAL, respondents.

G.R. Nos. 106314-15 | 1999-10-08

D E C I S I O N


PURISIMA, J:

At bar are Petitions for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Revised Rules of Court, seeking a review of the Decision1 [Penned by Justice Rodolfo A. Nocon and concurred in by Associate Justices Antonio M. Martinez and Asaali S. Isnani; Rollo p. 37-38.] of the Court of Appeals, dated November 13, 1991, and its Resolution2 [Penned by Associate Justice Antonio M. Martinez and concurred in by Associate Justices Asaali S. Isnani and Segundino G. Chua; Rollo, p. 43.] of July 9, 1992, denying the motion for reconsideration in CA- G.R. SP Nos. 28109 and 28110.

The two cases were tried jointly and decided by...