Back

Florentino Pamintuan Vs. Tomas Garcia, Et. Al. 039 Phil 746

FLORENTINO PAMINTUAN, plaintiff-appellant, vs. TOMAS GARCIA (deceased) ET. AL., defendants. TOMAS GARCIA (deceased) and JOSE M. DIZON, appellants.

G.R. No. 11984 | 1919-03-10

D E C I S I O N


CARSON, J .:

Limiting ourselves strictly to the question submitted by agreement of counsel for the various parties to these proceedings dated January 17, 1919, we are of opinion and so hold, that the language used in the disposing part of our decree entered while the case was pending on appeal,1 wherein we said "por consiguiente creemos que los frutos naturales o civiles que dichos bienes han producido, o que hayan podido producir, pertenecen a la sucesion de Tomas Garcia," is not susceptible of interpretation so as to include "industrial fruits."

The terms "natural," "industrial" and "civil fruits" are highly...