Back

Brigida Conculada, et.al. vs. Hon. CA,Jaamani-wee & Tian Su Wee

BRIGIDA CONCULADA, PACIANO GARCIA, JR., SPOUSES IMELDA and MOHAMMAD ALI SALASA, SPOUSES CONCEPCION and JAMES TAN, SPOUSES SONIA and ALNAEB JULJANI, SPOUSES RASALIE and YUSOP ABDULLA, PROVINCIAL PROSECUTOR MOHAMMADJAN SARAJAN, In his capacity as Acting Register of Deeds of Sulu, and ATTY. ULKA T. ULAMA, as counsel of the Petitioners, petitioners, vs. HON. COURT OF APPEALS, and SPOUSES KIMTOY JAMAANI-WEE and TIAN SU WEE, respondents.

G.R. No. 130562 | 2001-10-11

D E C I S I O N

QUISUMBING, J.:

Assailed in this petition for review is the decision[1] dated March 19, 1997 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. No. 47157 affirming the decision[2] of the Regional Trial Court of Sulu, Branch 3, in Civil Case No. 21-3 and its order dated July 31, 1997,[3] denying petitioners' motion for reconsideration.

Petitioner Paciano Garcia, Jr. and Henrietta Borja with their six siblings were co-owners of two (2) parcels of land covered by OCT No. 106 and OCT No. P-41. They inherited them from their parents, Paciano and Ernestina Garcia. Fronting the old public market of Jolo, those parcels had a combined area of...