Back

Rita Sarming, Rufino Sarming, et al. vs Cresencio Dy, Ludivina Dy-Chan, et al.

RITA SARMING, RUFINO SARMING, MANUEL SARMING, LEONORA VDA. DE LOY, ERLINDA DARMING, NICANDRA SARMING, MANSUETA SARMING, ARTURO CORSAME, FELY CORSAME, FEDERICO CORSAME, ISABELITA CORSAME, NORMA CORSAME, CESAR CORSAME, RUDY CORSAME, ROBERTA CORSAME, ARTEMIO CORSAME, ELPIDIO CORSAME, ENRIQUITA CORSAME, and GUADALUPE CORSAME TAN, petitioners, vs. CRESENCIO DY, LUDIVINA DY-CHAN, TRINIDAD FLORES, LUISA FLORES, SATURNINA ORGANISTA, REMEDIOS ORGANISTA, OFELIA ORGANISTA, LYDIA ORGANISTA, ZOSIMO ORGANISTA, DOMISIANO FLORES, FLORITA FLORES, EDUARDO FLORES, BENIGNA FLORES, ANGELINA FLORES, MARCIAL FLORES, and MARIO FLORES, respondents.

G.R. No. 133643 | 2002-06-06

D E C I S I O N

QUISUMBING, J.:

This petition for review assails the decision[1] dated September 23, 1997 of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 39401, which affirmed the decision[2] of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 41 in Negros Oriental, Dumaguete City and the resolution[3] dated April 21, 1998 denying petitioners' motion for reconsideration.

The facts as culled from records are as follows:

Petitioners are the successors-in-interest of original defendant Silveria Flores, while respondents Cresencio Dy and Ludivina Dy-Chan are the successors-in-interest of the original plaintiff Alejandra Delfino, the buyer of one of the lots...