Back

Cancio Jr. vs. Emerenciana Isip

JOSE S. CANCIO, JR., represented by ROBERTO L. CANCIO, petitioner, vs. EMERENCIANA ISIP, respondent.

G.R. No. 133978 | 2002-11-12

D E C I S I O N

YNARES-SANTIAGO, J.:

The instant petition for review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court raises pure questions of law involving the March 20, 1998[1] and June 1, 1998[2] Orders[3] rendered by the Regional Trial Court of Pampanga, Branch 49, in Civil Case No. G-3272.

The undisputed facts are as follows:

Petitioner, assisted by a private prosecutor, filed three cases of Violation of B.P. No. 22 and three cases of Estafa, against respondent for allegedly issuing the following checks without sufficient funds, to wit: 1) Interbank Check No. 25001151 in the amount of P80,000.00; 2) Interbank Check No. 25001152 in the amount...