Back

NHA vs Baello

NATIONAL HOUSING AUTHORITY, Petitioner, vs. PEDRO BAELLO, and his heirs ERNESTO, WILHELMA, CORAZON, LETICIA, CONRADO, ALBERTO, FEDERICO, OFELIA, EDGARDO, JASMINE, ALEJANDRO, JOSEFINA, ALEJANDRA, REYNALDO, EDITHA, MARISSA, FRANCISCO, FELICITAS, CYNTHIA, ALBERTO, MARITESS, IMELDA, SHIRLEY, JEANETTE, GLORIA, NOEL, ARNEL, HELEN, all surnamed BAELLO; LUZ BAELLO MAGAT and NICANOR and PEDRO, JR., both surnamed RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE & RICHARD DOE, Respondents.

G.R. No. 143230 | 2004-08-20

D E C I S I O N





CALLEJO, SR., J.:





This is a petition for review of the Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CV No. 51592 dismissing the appeal of the National Housing
Authority (NHA) from the Resolution of the Regional Trial Court of Caloocan City, Branch 128, dismissing the complaint in Civil Case No. 16399, as well as the Resolution denying its motion for reconsideration.



The Antecedents



Way back in October 23, 1911, a parcel of land with an area of 147,972 square meters located in Sitio Talisay, Municipality of Caloocan was surveyed for Esperanza Baello. The technical description thereof was shown in Plan...