Back

Manila Midtown Hotel vs Voluntary Arbitrator Dr. Rey A. Borromeo, et al

MANILA MIDTOWN HOTEL, Petitioner, versus VOLUNTARY ARBITRATOR DR. REY A. BORROMEO, THE MANILA MIDTOWN HOTEL EMPLOYEES LABOR UNION, RAFAEL QUILILAN, NINO VAMTA, LEO POTENCION, EDUARDO MUNOZ, JERRY SULA, EDGAR MAGDALUYO, RANDY TALENTO, RENEL MANALO, ROWENA CAO, JESUS VIRAY, RENATO MANAOIS, ANGELITA IGNACIO, CARLITO TALOSIG, AND THE SHERIFF OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT (DOLE), Respondents.

G.R. No. 138305 | 2004-09-22

D E C I S I O N

SANDOVAL-GUTIERREZ, J.:


Before us is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, as amended, assailing the Decision dated January 18, 1999[1] and Resolution dated April 19, 1999[2] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 48543, entitled "The Manila Midtown Hotel vs. Voluntary Arbitrator Dr. Rey A. Borromeo, The Manila Midtown Hotel Employees Labor Union, Rowena Cao, Jesus Viray, Renato Manaois, Angelita Ignacio, et al."

The controversy at bar arose from a complaint filed with the Office of the Voluntary Arbitrator, National Conciliation and Mediation Board (NCMB) by the...