Back

Ludo & Luym Development Corp. vs. Barretto, 471 SCRA 391

LUDO & LUYM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND/OR CPC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Petitioners, versus VICENTE C. BARRETO as substituted by his heirs, namely: MAXIMA L. BARRETO, PEREGRINA B. UY, ROGELIO L. BARRETO, VIOLETA L. BARRETO, FLORENDA B. TEMPLANZA, EDUARDO L. BARRETO, EVELYN B. BERSAMIN, CECILIA B. AQUINO and NELSON NILO L. BARRETO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 147266 | 2005-09-30

SECOND DIVISION

D E C I S I O N 

CHICO-NAZARIO, J.: 

The Case 

This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court seeking the reversal of the Decision[1] dated 24 November 2000, and the Resolution[2] dated 26 January 2001, rendered by the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 46025, which annulled and set aside the decision[3] dated 14 May 1997, and resolution[4] dated 12 August 1997, of the Department of Agrarian Reform Adjudication Board (DARAB) in DARAB Case No. 0776. In its decision, the DARAB affirmed the ruling[5] dated 03 April 1992 of the DARAB Regional Adjudication Office[6] (Regional Office)...