Back

Dr. Benita F. Osorio vs. Hon. Aniano A. Desierto, et al

DR. BENITA F. OSORIO, Petitioner, versus HON. ANIANO A. DESIERTO, as Ombudsman, HON. PRIMO C. MIRO, as Deputy Ombudsman for the Visayas, HON. VIRGINIA PALANCA-SANTIAGO, Ombudsman Director for the Visayas, and HON. SAMUEL MALAZARTE, Ombudsman Investigating Prosecutor for the Visayas, Respondents.

G.R. No. 156652 | 2005-10-13

D E C I S I O N 


CHICO-NAZARIO, J.: 

This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the 13 December 2002 Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 67511 which affirmed in toto the 12 January 2001 Resolution of the Office of the Ombudsman-Visayas in OMB-VIS-Crim-98-0811, as well as the order dated 17 July 2001 denying petitioner's motion for reconsideration. 

This instant petition originated from a letter-complaint dated 27 January 1998 by Beatriz L. Tenorio, addressed to the Ombudsman Aniano A. Desierto, accusing petitioner Dr. Benita Osorio, principal of Dr. Cecilio...