Back

Mamsar Enterprises Agro-Industrial Corporation vs. Varley Trading, Inc

MAMSAR ENTERPRISES AGRO-INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION, Petitioner, versus VARLEY TRADING, INC., Respondent.

G.R. No. 142729 | 2005-11-29

D E C I S I O N 


CORONA, J.: 

The petition before us, one for review on certiorari under Rule 45 from a decision of the Court of Appeals,[1] hinges exclusively on questions of fact. Petitioner Mamsar Enterprises contends that the Court of Appeals, in affirming the trial court, failed to properly appreciate crucial evidence it presented. 

In brief, the facts are as follows.[2] 

In September 1988, the respondent's chief operating officer, Paul Nesbitt, purchased heavy equipment to be used for petitioner's logging operations in the Sta. Clara logging area located in the mountains of Buayan, Ginuman and Bayug in the general...