Back

Miranda, et al vs. Tuliao

JOSE C. MIRANDA, ALBERTO P. DALMACIO, and ROMEO B. OCON, Petitioners, vs. VIRGILIO M. TULIAO, Respondent.

G.R. No. 158763 | 2006-03-31



FIRST DIVISION
D E C I S I O N 

CHICO-NAZARIO, J.: 

This is a petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court, assailing the 18 December 2002 Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. SP No. 67770 and its 12 June 2003 Resolution denying petitioners' Motion for Reconsideration. The dispositive portion of the assailed decision reads as follows: 

WHEREFORE, finding public respondent Judge Anastacio D. Anghad to have acted with grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction in issuing the assailed Orders, the instant petition for certiorari, mandamus and prohibition is hereby...