Back

Agapita Diaz vs. Court of Appeals, et al

AGAPITA DIAZ, Petitioner, versus COURT OF APPEALS; HEIRS OF SHERLY MONENO,[1] namely: MAMERTA C. MONENO, JASPHIN M. VILLAMIL, WHELHELMIA M. DECARO, EDDIE MONENO, GININA M. DAQUIPIL, FERNAN C. MONENO, ARLENE C. MONENO, RICHARD C. MONENO and NIKKI C. MONENO, represented by EDDIE C. MONENO; TEODORO LANTORIA and ROGELIO FRANCISCO, Respondents.

G.R. No. 149749 | 2006-07-25

SECOND DIVISION

R E S O L U T I O N 

CORONA, J.: 

In this petition for certiorari under Rule 65 of the Rules of Court, petitioner imputes grave abuse of discretion to the Court of Appeals vis-a-vis its May 30, 2001 decision[2] in CA-G.R. CV No. 67017, the dispositive portion of which read: 

WHEREFORE, premises considered, the present appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of merit. The Decision (Judgment) dated October 29, 1999 of the Regional Trial Court of Malaybalay City, Bukidnon, Branch 10 in Civil Case No. 2586-95 is hereby AFFIRMED and REITERATED.[3] 

The facts follow. 

Petitioner Agapita Diaz operated a common...