Back

Elenita C. Ishida, et al. vs. Antusa De Mesa-Magno, et al

ELENITA C. ISHIDA and CONTINENT JAPAN CO., INC., Petitioners, versus ANTUSA DE MESA-MAGNO, FIRMO DE MESA, MERCED LORENZA DE MESA, TEODORO DE MESA, and LOURDES DE MESA-MENDOZA, Respondents.

G.R. No. 136260 | 2006-07-28

SECOND DIVISION

D E C I S I O N 

GARCIA, J.: 

Assailed and sought to be set aside in this petition for review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court is the Decision[1] dated October 15, 1996 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 441550, as reiterated in its Resolution[2] of October 28, 1998 denying herein petitioners' motion for reconsideration. The basic CA Decision reversed that of the Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Quezon City, Branch 106, in an action for annulment of sale thereat commenced by the petitioners against the herein respondents. 

Reviewed, the records reveal the following factual antecedents: 

Sometime...