Back

Dr. Mussolini C. Barillo, et al. vs. Hon. Margarito Gervacio, et al.

DR. MUSSOLINI C. BARILLO, EDGARDO C. HINOGUIN, otherwise known as EDGAR C. HINOGUIN, JOSE REY S. ROJAS, RAYMUNDO PLAZA and TERESITA ALLEGO, Petitioners, versus HON. MARGARITO GERVACIO, in his Capacity as OIC Ombudsman HON. PRIMO MIRO, in his capacity as Deputy Ombudsman for the Visayas, HON. VIRGINIA P. SANTIAGO, in her capacity as Director, Office of the Ombudsman (Visayas) and the COMMISSION ON AUDIT, Region VII, Respondents.

G.R. No. 155088 | 2006-08-31

EN BANC
 
D E C I S I O N 
 
Tinga, J.:
 
This Petition[1] dated August 23, 2002 filed by Dr. Mussolini C. Barillo (Barillo), Edgardo Hinoguin (Hinoguin), Jose Rey S. Rojas (Rojas), Raymundo Plaza (Plaza) and Teresita S. Allego (Allego), assails the Decision[2] of the Court of Appeals dated July 31, 2002 which affirmed the resolution, memoranda and orders promulgated by the Office of the Ombudsman, Manila (Ombudsman) and the Office of the Deputy Ombudsman for the Visayas (Ombudsman-Visayas) in Administrative Case No. OMB-VIS-ADM 97-0243 entitled "Commission on Audit v. Dr. Mussolini C. Barillo, et al." 
 
...