Back

B. Espinosa vs. Prov'1 Adjudicator etc., et al

BONIFACIO ESPINOZA, Petitioner, versus PROVINCIAL ADJUDICATOR OF THE PROVINCIAL AGRARIAN REFORM ADJUDICATION OFFICE OF PAMPANGA and MARIA QUIBULOY, Respondents.

G.R. No. 147525 | 2007-02-26

D E C I S I O N
 


CORONA, J.:

Under review are the January 14, 1994 decision[1] and June 01, 2000 resolution[2] of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 502 UDK. The CA dismissed petitioner Bonifacio Espinoza's petition for certiorari imputing grave abuse of discretion on the part of the provincial adjudicator of the Provincial Agrarian Reform Adjudication Office (PARAD) of San Fernando, Pampanga in deciding DARAB Case No. 203-P-90.

The events leading to this petition for review on certiorari stemmed from an agrarian dispute before the PARAD, San Fernando, Pampanga. A complaint[3] for ejectment was filed against petitioner by...