Back

R. Padua vs. The Hon. CA, et al

ROBERTO PADUA, Petitioner, versus THE HON. COURT OF APPEALS, ATTY. DELFIN B. SAMSON, DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, and MR. TEOFILO INOCENCIO,* Respondents.

G.R. No. 153456 | 2007-03-02

D E C I S I O N
 


AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.:

Herein Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assails the December 18, 2001 Decision and May 7, 2002 Resolution[1] of the Court of Appeals (CA) which dismissed the Petition for Annulment of a Final and Executory Order of the Secretary of Agrarian Reform, docketed as CA- G.R. SP No. 59366.[2]

The CA summarized the facts as follows:

Private respondents Pepito Dela Cruz, et al. (Dela Cruz, et al.) were tenants of Lot Nos. 68 and 90 of the Dolores Ongsiako Estate in Anao, Tarlac. In 1966, upon the request of Anao Mayor Catalino Cruz (Mayor Cruz), Dela Cruz, et al. agreed to...