Back

Dept of Agrarian Reform etc. vs. Oroville Devt. Corp etc.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRARIAN REFORM, rep. by OIC-SECRETARY NASSER C. PANGANDAMAN, Petitioner, versus OROVILLE DEVELOPMENT CORP., rep. by ANTONIO H. TIU and WALDO G. REBOLOS, Respondent.

G.R. No. 170823 | 2007-03-27

D E C I S I O N

 


Tinga, J.:

The Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) assails the Amended Decision[1] of the Court of Appeals dated July 18, 2005, which declared the 48.8939-hectare property subject of this case as not covered by the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), and its Resolution[2] dated November 15, 2005, which denied the DAR's motion for reconsideration.

The undisputed facts are as follows:


On July 7, 1997, petitioner [Oroville Development Corporation] applied with DAR Regional Office No. X for exclusion of the subject property from CARP coverage pursuant to DAR Administrative Order No. 06, s. of 1994, entitled...