Back

David Sia Tio, et al. Vs. Lorenzo Abayata, et al.

DAVID SIA TIO and ROBERT SIA TIO, Petitioners, versus FELICIANO ABAYATA MIRANDO, AUREA ABAYATA GODINEZ, DOLORES ABAYATA PULVERA, CASILDA ABAYATA BOOC, RAFAELA ABAYATA BAGANO, JEREMIAS ABAYATA and the HEIRS OF ELENA ABAYATA MANATAD, namely: ALVIN, JESELA, ELENITA, CHONA and SUZETTE represented in this instance by their father ANTONIO MANATAD, Respondents.*

G.R. No. 160898 | 2008-06-27

D E C I S I O N


AUSTRIA-MARTINEZ, J.:

Assailed in the present Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court is the Decision[1] dated May 6, 2003 and Resolution[2] dated October 8, 2003, rendered by the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. 56665, dismissing the appeal of David Sia Tio and Robert Sia Tio (petitioners) and affirming the Decision dated November 29, 1996 of Regional Trial Court (RTC) of Lapu-Lapu City, Branch 54, in Civil Case No. 2230-L.

Civil Case No. 2230-L is an action for annulment of mortgage, mortgage sale, a subsequent sale and certificates of title, filed by the successors-in-interest...