Back

Mary Jane D. Velasco Vs. Atty. Charlie Doroin and Atty. Hector Centeno

MARY JANE D. VELASCO, Complainant,versus ATTY. CHARLIE DOROIN and ATTY. HECTOR CENTENO, Respondents.

A.C. No. 5033 | 2008-07-28

D E C I S I O N


PER CURIAM:

This case refers to a disbarment complaint filed by Mary Jane D. Velasco on March 31, 1999, against respondent lawyers for forgery and
falsification constitutive of malpractice.[1]

On June 21, 1999, the Court's Second Division required the respondent lawyers to comment on the complaint within (10) days from notice.[2]

On August 24, 1999, Atty. Quintin P. Alcid, counsel for respondents, filed a Motion for Extension to File Comment praying that an extension of sixty (60) days from August 16, 1999 be given to them to file their comment.[3]

On October 4, 1999, the Court granted the Motion for Extension with a...